The Economy Z profile is one of the original plastic pile designs used in the UK, and has proved extremely popular for ditch blocking, basic flood defences and erosion control.

The EcoZ is used in two formats, the Z rib and Box Rib formatm the former provides greater coverage and hence economy, whilst the later provides greater sturctural strength.

So if you are an existing user and are able to group together requirements, this offer is for you.   To qualify for this promotion you must order a minimum of 300 linear metres of product and this allows you to purchase for £6.50 per metre.  If your usage is much higher and you can order 3700 linear metres of EcoZ plastic piling then the price drops dramatically to £4.25 per linear metre!

APE making plastic piling more affordable!

Within the context of plastic sheet piling, restoration works centres upon the creation of plastic piling dams to block drains and ditches, as in accordance with guidance of Appendix XVII Plastic Piling Dams produced by the Scottish Executive, and documents such as Drain-blocking techniques on blanket peat: A framework for best practice by A. Armstrong et al. These documents illustrate the high level of interest in this area, and the importance of standardisation, in terms of methods and associated merits.

In the Armstrong document it is stated that the principal rationale for drain blocking in UK varies between stakeholders, but in most instances it is water table recovery to encourage more peat forming species to establish. Other aims or added benefits are reduction of dissolved organic carbon flux and reduced sediment transfer and erosion.

Armstrong et al continue to state that regardless of the motivation for drain-blocking at a site, it is desirable to create a watertight dam: if there is no flow then the water table rises, there is no sediment loss, dissolved organic carbon loss is generally decreased (Armstrong et al., in preparation), and pool environments are created which are ecologically beneficial.

Plastic sheet piling is stated as a preferred method used on around 5% of all dams included in the survey, but in practice and as recommended by these reports, typically only used on worst case scenarios – as a means of creating a watertight seal on large drains width greater than 0.7m2 and those with steepness greater than 3 degrees.

The attempt at standardisation and the detailing of a decision tree, is exceptionally important, but do nothing to lend appreciation to the fact that there are now a wide range of plastic sheet piling available, some cheaper than others, other stronger, other more versatile and finally there is a variety of pile interlocks creating a range of water tightness.

This is a very important point as the main limiting factor in the use of plastic sheet piling is clearly cost related, many sources stating that plastic sheet piling is one of the more expensive means of drain blocking. Armstrong et al acknowledge that the creation of a watertight seal is the most effective method to reduce sediment transfer, this is often set a lower priority to cost.

Appendix XVII is based upon a much older document and hence considers plastic piling in terms of the two oldest commercially available options, profiles analogous to our EcoZ or Masterpile. Its methods are thereby limited to the limitations of earlier designs. The consequence of this is that many organisations seeking to use plastic piling will follow antiquated information as a standard rather than benefit from improvements now available. Further, despite the recent nature of the Armstrong et al publication, it only considers plastic piling as a single generic option. This does have implications for a given design, the limits and performance of the design and the cost of that design.

Armstrong et al state “block spacing should not exceed 4 m and minimum spacing’s could be derived as a function of gully depth. The target height of a gully block should be 45 cm while 25 cm should be a minimum height.”

Yet no discussion is made as to how this could be increased by using plastic piling, or increased further by opting for a stronger form of plastic piling.

If one were to arbitrary state that plastic sheet piling is twice the price of the other methods, yet dams can be spaced out three times as far by selecting a stronger plastic pile, the overall economies of comparable methods would fall better into line.

There also seems concern in some high flow drains, whereby the practice of creating a double skin of plastic piles is proposed as a solution, surely using a stronger plastic pile, would reduce overall costs and installation times? Clearly, the use of plastic sheet piling needs further analysis, to provide best value solutions and not to focus upon the cheapest products, and further restricted by the limitations of other methods.

http://www.miniape.co.uk/Home/LatestNewsandArchives/News1RIBAOnlinePresentationnowavailable/tabid/118/Default.aspx

please join our following and be one of the first to hear about new products and information.

We are also pleased at the recent integration of a Youtube section on our new website, that permits visitors to view our latested Youtube uploaded videos and some favorites that we have located on equipment and other products that we hope visitors will find of great use.

The fantastic part of the video integration is that those new to plastic sheet piling will appreciate that our products can be driven, and we have the equipment and mandrels to facilitate this!

http://www.miniape.co.uk/Home/YoutubeVideos/tabid/153/Default.aspx

Further, if you do visit the site and find it informative and as useful as we hope, please Digg it!

Representation of New ProLock fully flat at front

New ProLock in action!

Plastic Piling From APE

www.miniape.com

Plastic is very sustainable, but it has a lower E-modulus than wood and steel. Softwood offers much strength and is cheap, but it rots away when it is applied at water surface. However, immersed softwood has a very long life span.

Therefore Profextru developed a sheet piling system which combines the characteristics of plastic with the benefits of softwood. The plastic screen is applied at the height where water is present up to ground level (and depending on the type of earth up to approx. 50 cm in the bottom), while the wooden pole is installed under the lowest water level, where it has to provide strength and the wood cannot rot.

Plastic piling has proven itself in many diverse applications:

Erosion Control, Drainage channels and Bank Retention

With the prolific use of timber retaining walls, either through willow bank construction, Nicopsan or the use of gabions systems with coir rolls; it is clear that these methods have merits appreciated throughout the industry.  The main perceived benefit, particularly Nicospan, is short term cost savings and also the natural aesthetics generated as plants grow through as the system mature.   However, these natural systems do not have the longevity of engineered sheet piling, the later of which can create a fully supporting system that will last 5 times longer, if not more.

APE appreciates that traditional sheet piling, including the older designs of plastic piling do create a very artificial appearing system.  Deep and repetitive corrugations which provide strength, do detract from the natural appearance of a waterway.  However, no “green engineering” technique to date produce the consistent level of viable long last solutions.  That stated APE have spent considerable resources seeking out products that can provide the best of both, and the MultiLock is definitely one product that meets this criteria.  It still has repetitive corrugations, but very shallow corrugations as it derives its strength from is full sectional shape, most of which is hidden in the bank or beneath the capping.   It is a full “green” solution in that it combines recycling with sustainability, whilst still maintaining longevity.

APE’s strategy in terms of its plastic piling is to offer an adoptive approach, where other methods or materials have merits, we seek to include them, not replace them.  Consider a Nicospan system, a geotextile supported each metre by a 100mm diameter post, the MultiLock can use an identical sized post every 25 cm.  Why not use both, the MultiLock just beneath the water level, where its strength and erosion control is unparralleled, and then thread the Nicospan through extended timbers above the MultiLock.  These timber supports could also be used in conjunction with coir rolls or bundles, either threaded around or directly attached!

That way you combine a structured approach with a method that will permit growth, maintaining that sought after natural appearance.

Traditional applications are clearly waterways related, such as retaining walls, seawalls, erosion and scour protection.  These applications benefiting from the increased longevity of the product and its resistance to natural causes of deterioration such as oxidation or biological attack.

Common Concerns

The two common concerns surrounding plastic piling, particularly those that have attempted installing older designs of plastic piling are:

• How do I install it?  Plastic is very flexible compared to steel, will standard piling equipment install them the same way?

• With the increase in the use of the canal and riverway infrastructure, how can plastic tolerate impacts from boats, surely they would get damaged and compromise the integrity of the bank support?

Installation

It is envisaged that the flexibility of these products will permit a wider usage within waterways, as the system requires much shallower installation, it can be used in much hard ground conditions, where traditional plastic piling could not be driven, but where steel tubes or timber posts can easily. 

In many cases, until now, not one manufacturer of plastic piling has provided any satisfactory answers, most will simply tell you that yes, standard equipment will drive them no problem any length. These comments are made without any true appreciation of piling equipment designed for installing steel.  APE has spent considerable resources designing interfaces and mandrels (the latest University project conducted by APE with Cranfield University, confirms our commitment).  These were all needed for even installing the shortest lengths of plastic piling! 

With the advent of the MultiLock, APE can concentrate its activities on driving substantial lengths as required for cut-off wall applications, through the provision of novel mandrel designs not to mention the release of the APEX Hammer!

Flood defences and Landfill Cut-off walls

Containing or excluding water is one of the key applications of plastic sheet piling, it does not rust like steel or rot like wood.  Therefore it is ideally suited to water based applications.  The ProLock MultiLock range is perhaps best suited to retaining walls and bank support, since its concept is one of minimising sheet length to reduce overall cost, without reducing product quality.  Within a cut-off application such economy is not an option since the pile needs to be driven to depth to provide a cut-off.  That stated the MultiLock and ProLock do have certain advantages within this applications.

Firstly, these products are 500mm wide and therefore interlocks are more spaced apart reducing leakage paths.  The increase width, further reduces the number of piles that needs to be driven, especialiiy important when a large perimeter needs covering.   The price per metre is more expensive than the Europile, but its square metre coverage works out around the same.  

The novel symmetrical shape of the MultiLock profile means that this pile is naturally more rigid and therefore would more efficiently drive using a vibratory hammer, than conventional plastic piling.   Within these applications long lengths around 4-7 metres need to be installed, all plastic piling is flexible to an extent, however only the ProLock and MultiLock can be driven with steel tubes or timber posts.

In most applications the steel tubes or timbers are required for additional load bearing.  In this application there is only one load, that being the load during installation, the use of internal timbers or tubes will rigidise internally the plastic pile making longer lengths easier to drive without full pan mandrels such as the Stabcat Stommper.  

For areas where the works are simply to build up existing flood defences, then this system clearly has the main installation advantage.  This product has been used by major Civil Engineering Companies and also home-owners and onwers of caravan parks.  The product appeals to main stream civil engineering since it is a quality well engineered product, it appeals to less technical users as it is so easy to install, making it ideal for domestic usage.  In Holland, there are even examples of it being used domestically for ponds, fencing as well as building up local flood defences when garden end adjacent to water courses.

Retaining Walls and Embankment Support

The ProLock MultiLock product range is better suited to permanent works rather than temporary, and would represent an ideal product from carriage way embankment slope support and stabilisation. The Transport Research Laboratory (TRL) conducted major research into the use of Plastic Piling and has published a report into their findings, Guidance on the Structural Use of Plastic Sheet Piling in Highway Applications (ref: TRL 533). A copy of this research is available by contacting the TRL 

Prior to the release of this report APE met with Dr Derek Carder, to provide information on installation methods, the concept of the proposal was to install tiers of 4m plastic piles.  However at that stage, it was a concern whether 4 metre lengths of traditional plastic piling could be handled.  These 4 metre piles would need to be driven 3 metres to provide support for a 1 metre retaining wall, within each tier.